Comparison Report

AudienceLab vs DataShopper

We ran the tests. See our analysis of data from DataShopper and how it compares to AudienceLab.

0M+

US Consumer Profiles

0%

Data Accuracy

0B+

Behaviours Scanned Weekly

0+

Agencies & Advertisers

*This is based on 98% of US households which currently sits at approx 127,482,865 according to the US Census Bureau.

The True Cost

What Is It Really Costing You?

DataShopper's data isn't verified.
To make it usable, you'd need to clean it yourself.
Here's what that actually costs.

Catch-all Email Validation

$0.00255 per record

$2,550.00

Phone Validation & Skip Trace

$0.02 per record

$20,000.00

NCOA Validation for Accurate Addresses

$0.05 per record

$50,000.00

Total Cost to Clean the Data

$72,550.00

just to make DataShopper's data usable

AudienceLab includes all of this — verification, skip tracing, and NCOA — built into the platform.

True Match Rate

How Data Decays with Probabilistic Matching

A promised 60% match rate sounds great.
But after probabilistic IP matching and accuracy decay,
here's what you actually get.

Expected Match Rate

60% of matched records

60,000

Probabilistic IP Matches

70% of matched records

42,000

Accuracy

20% of matched records

8,400

True Match Rate

8.40%

actual usable matches from probabilistic data

AudienceLab uses deterministic matching — no probabilistic guessing, no inflated match rates.

Problem 01

Consumer Database Accuracy

DataShopper's Approach

DataShopper uses unverified data from a generic co-registration dataset. Co-reg data comes from online form fills — information that can be made up, fake, or severely out of date.

Example: Someone fills out a form on CreditRepair.com in July 2024. That email, mobile, and name could still be sold in 2026 and beyond. These datasets typically test below 40% accuracy.

The AudienceLab Difference

Every 30 days, AudienceLab's core consumer file goes through a NCOA database verification update — every single address is verified against official post office data.

Roughly 11-12% of the US population moves every year, meaning a database even 1 year old could have up to 20% data decay. Most co-reg datasets are never NCOA verified to begin with.

Verified database visualization
Problem 02

No Email Verification

DataShopper's Approach

DataShopper uses a commonly known email file — an assortment of historic personal and business emails. The data is not verified; instead it has "ESP Valid" which just means the email has existed before.

This means up to 40% bounce rate and emails that are out of date or no longer belong to that person. Their own deliverability data shows ~46% "Risky" and ~8% "Bad."

The AudienceLab Difference

AudienceLab owns and operates DEEEP (deeepverify.com) — a full email verification engine responsible for cleaning over 10 million emails every 24 hours.

The entire database is fully verified every 2-3 months. This means dramatically lower bounce rates and emails that actually reach the right person.

DataShopper's deliverability data — 46% Good, 46% Risky, 8% Bad
Problem 03

IP-Based Matching Without Accuracy

DataShopper's Approach

DataShopper claims up to 70% match rate, mostly through IP-based matches. IPs are places, not people. Without proper quality control, they frequently match the wrong identity.

Example: If John Smith is at Starbucks using WiFi and visits a website with an IP-resolution pixel, he — and everyone else at the coffee shop — gets classified as a match. That's 50-100 people matched at once, skewing rates and matching wrong identities.

The AudienceLab Difference

AudienceLab uses Geo Frame Resolution — the process of assigning a recently logged-in IP address to the latest longitude and latitude of the household.

If John Smith is at Starbucks on public WiFi, we identify it's really him away from his core residence and only match his identity. This can only be achieved by having the most recently updated coordinates of an address through continuous NCOA verification.

Geo frame resolution visualization
Problem 04

Mobile Number Accuracy

DataShopper's Approach

DataShopper uses mobile numbers likely sourced from co-reg/co-op databases. When you call someone, they either won't answer or it's the wrong person entirely.

The co-reg data is out of date or contains wrong information. Choosing the right number is a hit and miss — destroying your clients' trust and campaign performance.

The AudienceLab Difference

AudienceLab runs a skip tracing service to match all data across 10-20 other offline datasets to confirm it's the actual number that belongs to that person.

This means high connectivity rates, better pick-ups from clients, and more deals closed. Your phone data actually works.

Mobile number validation and accuracy verification
Problem 05

Intent Scoring Via Third-Party API

DataShopper's Approach

DataShopper uses an intent feed via third-party API — meaning there's no closed-back feedback loop to train false positives or hard negatives on any intent list.

This creates a lack of accuracy in the "distance" from a topic to the original source. Example: People classified with intent for "Metal Sheet Roofing" may only be on generic blogs that mention "roofing" — no actual context, just noise.

The AudienceLab Difference

AudienceLab's intent model is powered by a continuous feedback loop which identifies false positives and hard negatives to create stricter rules for intent.

We tested across other generic feeds (including DataShopper) and found massive "noise" — URL-to-HEM pairings that are either unrelated or too distant from the actual topic. Our system filters this out.

Taxonomy + URLs Visualization (UMAP) — showing noise in intent data

*Bright red blob represents HEM <> URL pairings that have "far distance" and not relevant intent

Head-to-Head

See the Difference

A side-by-side comparison that speaks for itself. Signal vs. noise.

Database Accuracy

AudienceLab
95%
DataShopper
~40%

Email Deliverability

AudienceLab
92%+
DataShopper
~54%

Identity Resolution Precision

AudienceLab
Geo-Frame
DataShopper
IP-Only

Mobile Connectivity

AudienceLab
Skip Traced
DataShopper
Co-Reg

Intent Accuracy

AudienceLab
Feedback Loop
DataShopper
3rd Party API

Consumer Profiles

AudienceLab308M+ (NCOA Verified)
DataShopper280M+ (Unverified Co-Reg)

Database Refresh

AudienceLabEvery 30 Days via NCOA
DataShopperUnknown / Stale

Email Verification

AudienceLabDEEEP Engine (10M+/day)
DataShopperESP Valid Only

Email Bounce Rate

AudienceLab<8%
DataShopperUp to 40%

Identity Resolution

AudienceLabGeo Frame Resolution
DataShopperBasic IP Matching

Mobile Verification

AudienceLabSkip Traced (10-20 sources)
DataShopperCo-Reg / Co-Op

Intent Model

AudienceLabClosed Feedback Loop
DataShopper3rd Party API Feed

Intent Accuracy

AudienceLabContinuous Training
DataShopperNo Feedback Loop

Behaviours Scanned

AudienceLab60B+ Weekly
DataShopperNot Disclosed

White Label

AudienceLabFull White Label
DataShopperWhite Label

True Data Ownership

AudienceLabYes
DataShopperNo
The Bottom Line

You're Not Paying for Data.
You're Paying for a Moat.

With AudienceLab, you're not paying for third-party access to an API or co-reg data that your competitors can duplicate. You're investing in infrastructure that can't be replicated.

NCOA-Verified Identity Spine

Consumer data verified every 30 days via NCOA — the gold standard for address accuracy.

Proprietary Email Engine

DEEEP cleans 10M+ emails daily across the entire dataset. Not a third-party API — we own it.

Geo Frame Resolution

IP-to-household matching using real-time longitude/latitude coordinates. No more coffee shop false matches.

Closed-Loop Intent

Continuous feedback loop trains out false positives and noise. Real evidence for real intent.

This is how DaaS agencies aren't just winning — they're working with real enterprise clients and even exiting.

Ready to See the Signal?

Stop paying for noise. Schedule a demo and see exactly why 1,000+ agencies and advertisers chose AudienceLab as their data infrastructure.

Schedule Your Demo

No commitment required · See the data live · Get your questions answered